Profil de Michael E.Financial ConservationPhotosBlog Outils Aide

Financial Conservation

A Clear-Eyed Perspective On The Changing Economic Environment

James Galbraith's Rx for Wall Street Reform

James Galbraith's Rx for Wall Street Reform
 

"The post-op on the great crash of 2008 continued in Washington Thursday as the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) held a hearing on financial reform.

'Unfortunately, the regulatory regime that failed so terribly leading up to the financial crisis is precisely the regulatory regime we have today,' Treasury Secretary Geithner declared. 'We need comprehensive financial reform.'

There is a way to have a financial system with a 'reasonable degree of stability' and 'serves a public purpose,' Galbraith says. 'But it does require having a government which is not run by the financial sector.'

Galbraith didn't use the term 'Government Sachs,' but said 'we're not going to get where we need to get...if you have this revolving door where all the people from Wall Street go down to Washington and offer their services and basically serve their own worldview and the financial interests of their friends.'"

MED Comment: Arsonist or Firefighter?  You can't be both at the same time.

Secretary Geithner served in key economic roles such as an Under Secretary of the Treasury for both Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers when they were in his current position, and more recently as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Clearly, Secretary Geithner was a member of the major insiders club that exercised considerable influence and who knew the real internal workings of our economy during the period of time that our severly under code financial house of cards was under construction.

Dr. Galbraith makes an essential point.  It defies common sense to expect that the same type of insider mindset that has been traveling a career path in the same tight circles with those who have heavy vested interests in maintaining the status quo will suddenly start demanding — without backing down — the kind of across the board transparency that will be critically necessary to restore our economic health.

Time to stop buying into this self-serving notion that only the same recurring candidates from the same clubs are available or capable of filling these positions.

Where's the real change for the better?

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/375918/%22A-Govt.-Not-Run-by-the-Financial-Sector%22-James-Galbraith's-Rx-for-Wall-Street-Reform?tickers=XLF,FAS,FAZ,GS,MS,JPM,C

www.financialconservation.com

The Dilemma: Bull or Bear?

 
Bull

Liz Ann Sonders, chief market strategist at Charles Schwab, represents the more bullish point of view saying, "It's very clear we're in the midst of a V-shaped recovery." Tech Ticker credits Ms. Sonders with keeping its viewers ahead of the curve. It goes on to say, "In October 2008 she said the recession was upon us and would be deep. Remember, this was months before the NBER's official declaration and at a time when most economists were debating whether or not a recession was in the offing. In June 2009 she said the recession was ending, if not already over, a highly controversial statement at the time."

Ms. Sonders says, "I'm on the more optimistic end of the spectrum," she says. "I'm not expecting the kind of pop in growth you'd normally see after such a big compression, but probably [growth] still above what is a very low level of expectations."

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/369869/On-the-Money-So-Far-Liz-Ann-Sonders-Is-%22On-the-Optimistic-End-of-the-Spectrum%22?tickers=%5EDJI,%5EGSPC,SPY,DIA,SCHW,TIP,%5EIXIC

Bear

Robert Prechter, founder of Elliott Wave International and author of Conquer the Crash, is on the other end of the spectrum cautioning retail investors to "stay away... for now." He was bullish near the lows in March, but now says the stock market "is in a topping area." Mr. Prechter compares the current market to those of 1966-74 or 1929-32, where massive bear rallies gave way to another "big leg down", i.e., a W-shaped recovery.

Mr. Prechter is predicting another crash in 2010 that will bring stocks below this year's lows. His word to the wise, "be patient, don't rush it" keep your money in cash and cash equivalents for now and wait out this bear market. His analysis further indicates 5 or more years before we turn the corner into real bull territory and "it'll be the buying opportunity of a lifetime."

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/367008/Bob-Prechter-Bear-Market-Rally-Is-Over-Stocks-Headed-For-New-Lows?tickers=spy,qqqq,dia,%5Egspc,%5Edji,uup,udn

Ms. Sonders and Mr. Prechter are professionals who have both made, through extensive research and study of the same market history, reasonable sounding arguments for their diametrically opposing views. They represent armies of experts on both sides of the ongoing bull vs. bear debate.  Whether the market as a reflection of the underlying economy will experience a W, V, U, "Square Root" or whatever shape of recovery, remains to be seen.

As emphasized in my previous posts, my personal view is that we will be stuck in a volatile environment until we have seriously tackled the underlying structural rigging problems of our economy that were decades in the making.

However, I am optimistic that, unlike before, these problems are being dragged kicking and screaming out of the shadows and into the public eye where with full recognition -- over time -- they will be resolved.

How to Solve the Dilemma: Core Asset Conservation

First, let's stop buying into this Wall Street notion that we have to "climb the wall of worry" for the rest of our lives. There are alternatives.

As a financial planner, I specialize in the management and preservation of what are defined as Living and Legacy Core Assets.  For my clients, the bull vs. bear dilemma is solved by placing these core assets in a step structure that provides, safety of principal, locked-in gains as credited and liquidity.  By utilizing the indexing method, clients are able to share in the upsides of the market, but have an automatic defense system in place that eliminates the possibility of losing principal or credited gains whenever the market wave patterns turn negative.

When you know that your Living and Legacy Core Assets are safe, with non-core assets that have direct exposure to the markets, you are in a far stronger position -- financially and psychologically -- to either try and time the upswings and downswings, or just ride out any of the more severe downturns which may occur and not be forced to sell at the wrong time.

From the standpoint of timing, milestones in life, such as college tuition, an untimely death or guaranteed retirement income are totally indifferent to whatever state the economy or the markets may be in at the time they arrive. 

True asset allocation is adding the guarantees of the step structure as a permanent feature to the mix of diversifying risks among the wave patterns of various assets classes in order to provide the stability you can rely on to support the milestones for yourself and those who depend on you.

For a more detailed explanation of Core Asset Conservation, click on the following link:

http://www.financialconservation.com/core_asset_conservation.php

 

Privatizing Gains and Socializing Losses

Privatizing Gains and Socializing Losses
 
"Repealing Glass-Steagall was 'obnoxious' and a bipartisan 'absurdity'...

The end result of the repeal was you have 'taxpayers subsidizing risk-taking' on Wall Street...

'It's the most anti-capitalist thing I've ever heard of in my life.'
 
...Glass-Steagall wasn't regulation, 'it was common sense'..."

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/369201/Why-Jamie-Dimon-Wants-to-Silence-Paul-Volcker?tickers=JPM,GS,MS,WFC,BAC,C,XLF



"Job Losses Could Trigger Round 2 of Banking Crisis"

"Job Losses Could Trigger Round 2 of Banking Crisis"
 
 

"The unemployment rate now stands at 10.2%, yet stocks are at a 2009 high. The bulls will tell you not to worry; the unemployment rate is a lagging indicator. True as that may be, Charlie Gasparino author of The Sellout, has a word of warning: the jobs data may be a leading indicator when it comes to the health of our banking system.

One of Gasparino's sources, Calyon Securities banking analyst Mike Mayo (who warned of the credit bubble before the crash) tells him, if unemployment rises to 11%, 'there could be an issue where we have round 2 of this crisis.'

Why?

  • If unemployment ticks higher, more consumer loans are likely to go into default and banks may have problems covering the additional loan losses. For now, banks are thriving from a low interest rate environment that allows them to borrow for nearly nothing and invest in safe Treasuries at 3.5%. That could all change if they need to boost reserves.
  • Banks may find it difficult to raise more capital after already taking billions from the government. Are you willing to lend to zombie banks like Citigroup and Bank of America? Even relatively healthy banks like JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo might find it difficult.
  • Toxic assets still infect the banking industry. Gasparino says $7 trillion in derivatives isn't a problem that goes away overnight, especially if the economy gets worse and their value falls once again. 'It took 30 years to build this toxic assets, they [banks] haven't sold a lot of it, they haven’t written it down to zero,' he warns.

How can we solve the problem?

Prevent outlandish risk taking behavior. The government should send a clear message to the banks, he says. 'Cut that umbilical cord right now… if you screw up this time you're on your own.'

Recent history suggests that's easier said then done."

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/368866/Charlie-Gasparino-Job-Losses-Could-Trigger-Round-2-of-Banking-Crisis?tickers=bac,wfc,jpm,c,gs,ms,xlf

 

Elizabeth Warren, chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel for bank bailouts

Elizabeth Warren, chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel
for bank bailouts

 

"The numbers are bleak -- unemployment has surpassed 10 percent for the first time since 1983 -- and Warren is not surprised.

'Let's face it,' Warren said, 'This is sort of how we went about the rescue -- we rescued at the top and we left the bottom to kind of fend for itself -- and that's showing up in the unemployment numbers.'

Warren went on to explain that the report is really about the guarantees the Government made to protect banks' assets while leaving the public out to dry.

Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough suggested that it was the old 'socialize the risks, privatize the gains' scenario, but Warren took it one step further.

'The way I think of it is: they say something like 'Give me your money, investors and I'm going to Las Vegas and put it all on red 22. And if red 22 comes in -- woo! we are RICH. If red 22 doesn't come in, don't worry because the tax payers will pay you back the money you invested.'"

See post: The Cheerleaders vs. The Chicken Littles and comments re "A Jobless Recovery"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/06/elizabeth-warren-we-rescu_n_348397.html

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/546/index.html